1. The person did not voluntarily execute the contract. 2. The agreement was unacceptable to this person during the execution and before the implementation of the agreement: 25-204. Amending or revoking an agreement After the marriage, a pre-marital contract can only be amended or revoked by a written agreement signed by the parties. The amended agreement or revocation is enforceable without consideration. In 1983, the National Conference of Uniform Commissioners adopted the final version of the Uniform Act of the Pre-Brand Agreement. Since then, the law has been passed in modified form by the various states: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Iceland, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and Virginia. The act focuses on the provision that such an agreement is universal when it is available in writing and that it determines the factors to be considered when the agreement is called into question.
D. Where a provision of a pre-marital agreement alters or eliminates spousal support and the result that a party is eligible at the time of separation or dissolution of the marriage to assist a party in a public support program, a court may ask the other party, notwithstanding the terms of the agreement, to provide support to the extent necessary to avoid such eligibility. E. A question of the insularity of a pre-marriage contract is decided by the court. f. When a marriage is declared null and void, an agreement that would otherwise have been a pre-marital agreement is enforceable only to the extent necessary to avoid an unwarranted result. There are several reasons for the development of a marriage pact. Some people think that prenups are only for very wealthy couples, but the reality is that every couple with assets, potential business interests, debts or children should seriously consider having a marriage agreement before marriage. In these cases, the courts may invalidate existing agreements. It is unacceptable to maintain a prenupe that leaves virtually nothing to one spouse and the other. Courts may also object or refuse to enforce marriage contracts with punitive clauses for matters such as weight gain, visits to in-progress or other social/personal requirements. But at the end of the day, Alabama`s marital agreement law can be quite complex, with several subtleties to follow to make the agreements applicable.
A marriage contract, also known as a one-year contract in Alabama, is a contract between two people who decide to marry. The agreement describes how the couple wants their estate to be shared if they divorce. The Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (UPAA) is a single law on marriage contracts, also known as “pre-marital agreements” and “association agreements.”  It was designed in 1983 by the National Conference of Commissioners on The Laws of the State on Uniform to promote greater uniformity and predictability between state laws with respect to pre-marital agreements in an increasingly temporary society.